Cranleigh Arts Centre
West Surrey Area
Museums & Art Galleries
The Cradle of Modern Art
Report of the lecture given by
Michael Howard BA MA
on February 22nd
quickly it became clear that Michael Howard was no dilettante: we were going to
be presented with more than biographical details of the late 19th and early 20th
century Paris artists. He began by describing the background to the huge
outpouring of art in Paris at that time. Paris was a city familiar with
revolutions. In 1890 an avant-garde movement was establishing and
institutionalizing itself in the modern fashion for the first time. Paris had
become the centre of art and food; a place to which people flocked.
Howard pointed out how people's lives were changing owing to the
advancement of science, technology, travel, photography and engineering.
They built the Eiffel Tower because they could, quipped Howard.
Whilst we were assimilating the volume of information coming from the
zealous Michael Howard, he gave us a quote from Oscar Wilde, who had taken
refuge in Paris after his imprisonment in England. Wilde was said to have
lunched regularly under the Eiffel Tower. When asked why he replied: "My
dear boy, it's the only place in Paris where one cannot see the thing."
Howard pointed out that Spiritualism was becoming popular. In 1899
Freud published his "Interpretation of Dreams". Photography dealt with
the way things looked but the avant-garde wanted to portray the inside of
stressed that all art is derivative. We were shown Seurat's Un Dimanche d'été
sur l'île de la Grande Jatte 1886.
The subjects are not communicating; all is not what it seems. The
artist is taking us beyond the superficial. Cezanne's Bathers came up on
the screen and we could see his geometric patterns and be aware of Cubism that
was to be explored by Picasso and Braque in later years.
Howard went on to show us Degas' studies of human movement and the
paintings by Monet: a theme to be studied by the Futurists later on.
The speaker moved on to the two giants of the Paris scene: Matisse and
Picasso. Matisse was experimenting with colour; he wanted to extend colour as an
emotional form. We were shown some of his portraits where vibrant colours
adorned his sitters' faces: Matisse had insisted that the paintings were not
real to look at but the qualities of the sitters are there. We were shown
several examples of the vibrant, exciting paintings done by Matisse when he
joined with Derain and other artists to form a group known as the Fauves
[wild animals]. If any of the audience were feeling sleepy they surely were
woken up by the joyous colours.
goes on to describe Picasso as voracious compared to the more reflective
Matisse. We were shown Picasso's The Family of Saltimbanques: a group of
itinerant circus performers occupying a desolate landscape, each figure
psychologically isolated from the other. We are told that artists at that time
were interested in African masks. It seems that Matisse sees the beauty in them
but Picasso sees the mystery. We were shown Picasso's Les Demoiselles
d'Avignon: a harsh depiction of five women in a brothel; three of the women
wear African masks. The lines of their bodies are sharp and hostile.
lecturer saw Matisse as a creator who saw the human body as beautiful. His
Dancers express the joy of living whereas Picasso was a destroyer. He
sees the dark joy of living.
Well we have the freedom to come to our own conclusions, however, I am
left not knowing which to admire more: Michael Howard's vast knowledge or his
ability to fire information at the audience in large volumes.
Michael Howard with one of our members